Key result
Fatty liver predicts ~170% higher CAD risk, a stronger independent predictor than visceral fat.
Why the study?
The roles and contributions of fatty liver and visceral fat storage to coronary artery disease were not clear.
Does non-alcoholic fatty liver disease predict coronary artery disease better than visceral fat storage?
Observational
Does non-alcoholic fatty liver disease predict coronary artery disease better than visceral fat storage?
Liver fat storage is a strong independent risk factor for CAD and carotid atherosclerosis, contributing more than visceral fat storage.
Fatty liver was associated with higher CAD odds than visceral fat; leaves open whether it improves risk stratification in prospective studies.
Fatty liver is one aspect of metabolic syndrome. The roles and contributions of fatty liver and visceral fat storage to coronary artery disease (CAD) are not clear. This study measured associations among visceral fat storage, fatty liver, insulin resistance, atherosclerosis, and CAD. Patients were divided into three groups: excess visceral fat (visceral fat area >330 ± 99 cm2), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and a control group. The definition of fatty liver is liver minus spleen density greater than or equal to −10. We defined early atherosclerosis as intima–media thickness of the common carotid artery >7 mm in men and >0.65 mm in women, measured with Doppler ultrasound. Visceral fat area was defined using CT (>330 ± 99 cm2). Insulin-resistance biomarkers (HOMA), CRP, and oxidant–antioxidant status (MDA-Paraoxonase) were also measured. Patients with high liver or visceral fat showed higher coronary plaque prevalence (50% (p < 0.001), 38% (p < 0.01), respectively vs. 25% in the control group), higher prevalence of coronary stenosis (30% (p < 0.001), 22% (p < 0.01) vs. 11% in the control group), higher intimal thickening (0.98 ± 0.3 (p< 0.01), 0.86 ± 0.1 (p < 0.01) vs. 0.83 ± 0.1 in the control group), higher HOMA (4.0 ± 3.0 (p < 0.005), 3.0 ± 1.0 (p < 0.001) vs. 1.5 ± 1.2 in the control group), and higher triglyceride levels (196.8 ± 103 (p < 0.005), 182.6 ± 90.87 (p < 0.005) vs. 145 ± 60 in the control group). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that fatty liver predicted CAD (OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.3–4.9, p < 0.001) independently of visceral fat storage (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.2–2.8, p < 0.001). Liver fat storage is a strong independent risk factor for CAD and carotid atherosclerosis and contributes more than visceral fat storage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basheer et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease. Fatty liver vs. Visceral fat and control group was evaluated on Coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.3-4.9, p=< 0.001). Fatty liver was a stronger independent predictor of coronary artery disease (OR 2.7; 95% CI 2.3-4.9; p<0.001) than visceral fat storage (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.2-2.8; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: