Key result
Worse global longitudinal strain is linked to significant coronary artery disease and angiographic severity.
Why the study?
Strain imaging detects subtle ischemia, but its correlation with angiographic CAD severity in chronic coronary syndrome needed evaluation.
Does global longitudinal strain assessed by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography correlate with the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic coronary syndrome?
Observational (n=150)
Single-blind
No
Does global longitudinal strain assessed by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography correlate with the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic coronary syndrome?
Global longitudinal strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography serves as an effective, non-invasive surrogate marker for identifying subclinical ischemia and estimating coronary angiographic severity in chronic coronary syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GLS was associated with CAD severity; extends deformation imaging data but leaves open its role in guiding management.
Background: Chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) constitutes 20%–30% of cardiac causes of chest pain. Deformation/Strain imaging is a sensitive marker of coronary artery disease (CAD) which detects subtle forms of ischemia in the form of strain. We aim to correlate global longitudinal and segmental strain with angiographic profile by using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out on 150 subjects satisfying the inclusion criteria. Routine blood investigations, electrocardiogram, 2D echocardiography, and 2D-STE were performed. All subjects underwent coronary angiogram (CAG), and the severity of CAD was assessed by modified Gensini score (mGS). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and segmental strain were correlated with mGS. Results: Mean age was 55.28 ± 8.94 years. Males constituted 67.3% of the study population. The most common symptom was angina (54%), and the most common risk factor was type 2 diabetes mellitus (37%). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 58.6%. The mean GLS in the Significant CAD group was −13.8% and in the Insignificant CAD group was −17.7% ( P < 0.01). The Pearson correlation analysis between GLS and segmental strain had a strong negative correlation ( P < 0.01). GLS cutoff for significant single vessel disease was −18.8 (sensitivity 98%, specificity 86%, area under the curve 0.93; P = 0.03). Conclusion: This study emphasizes the role of a simple, noninvasive transthoracic echocardiographic marker in predicting subclinical ischemia in CCS who have apparently normal LVEF. GLS correlates with the angiographic severity in CCS. The myocardial segmental strain correlates with angiographic territorial involvement. It is an independent predictor of significant CAD with good sensitivity and specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imamuddin et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Chronic coronary syndrome (n=150). Significant coronary artery disease vs. Insignificant coronary artery disease was evaluated on Mean global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p=<0.01). Global longitudinal strain was significantly lower in patients with significant coronary artery disease (-13.8%) compared to those with insignificant disease (-17.7%) and showed a strong negative correlation with angiographic severity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: