This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
= .01). Using the same threshold (score of 10 or greater considered positive), AI correctly localized 84.4% (282 of 334) of screening-detected (true-positive) cancers and correctly categorized 85.9% (286 of 333) and 73.3% (244 of 333) of true-negative and false-positive cases, respectively, as negative. Conclusion AI correctly localized nearly one-third of interval cancers at retrospective evaluation of screening DBT examinations and has the potential to decrease the interval cancer rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bahl et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: