Conceptual analysis reveals ecological limits of market-driven human-robot interaction, highlighting the value of post-growth and degrowth frameworks.
Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) research is starting to engage with sustainability, yet the field remains tied to economic models that assume continual growth, rapid technological development, and market expansion. This economic growth orientation raises questions about whether HRI can genuinely support ecological responsibility, given the resource intensity of robotics research, production, and deployment. In this contribution, we introduce a post-growth perspective to reframe the relationship between robotics, sustainability, and society. We argue that rather than striving for `green growth' within existing economic structures, HRI should engage critically with concepts such as degrowth and post-capitalism. By shifting attention from growth to development, we invite the community to consider what robotic futures are worth pursuing and for whom.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thunberg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: