Key result
Pranava Pranayama enhances SpO2 and heart rate versus quiet sitting in healthy volunteers.
Why the study?
Does Pranava Pranayama improve oxygen saturation and heart rate compared to quiet sitting in healthy volunteers?
RCT (n=58)
Single-blind
randomized self-controlled cross-over
Does Pranava Pranayama improve oxygen saturation and heart rate compared to quiet sitting in healthy volunteers?
p-value: p=0.032
Pranava Pranayama provides an immediate, significant improvement in oxygen saturation and heart rate in healthy volunteers compared to quiet sitting.
Pranava Pranayama may acutely boost SpO2 and HR in healthy adults; extends RCT evidence for yogic breathing.
Introduction: Yoga is known to promote health and wellness in all. Pranava Pranayama is a useful sound based yogic breathing technique with reported benefits such as potentiating vagal tone. Subjects and Methods: This single blinded randomized self-controlled cross-over study was done with 58 participants. The immediate effect of Pranava Pranayama on saturation of oxygen in the blood (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) was determined before and after intervention using pulse oximeter. To avoid extraneous influences due to recording on different days, one half of the subjects were randomized to perform quiet sitting on day 1 while other half did Pranava Pranayama which was then reversed on day 2. Results: Intra group comparison showed significant changes (p < 0.001) in both SpO2 and HR following Pranava Pranayama whereas in the quiet sitting group, there was an insignificant fall in the SpO2 readings but HR was found significant (p < 0.001). Intergroup comparison showed significant differences between groups (p-0.032). Discussion: Cardiovascular changes following Pranava Pranayama may be as a result of audible chanting improving baroreflex sensitivity along with increased endogenous nitric oxide production. This promotes vasodilatation resulting in reduction of BP. The decrease in vascular resistance and an increase in capillary perfusion results in increased oxygen saturation with lesser demand on the heart. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that Pranava Pranayama is an effective technique in enhancing SpO2 and our findings may have therapeutic applications especially in the current pandemic situation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramanathan et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=58). Pranava Pranayama vs. Quiet sitting was evaluated on Saturation of oxygen in the blood (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) (p=0.032). Pranava Pranayama significantly enhanced oxygen saturation and heart rate compared to quiet sitting in healthy volunteers (intergroup p=0.032).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: