Key result
SIESTA-A protocol plans to compare the effectiveness and safety of DOACs versus VKAs in AF.
Why the study?
Comparative analyses of DOACs in clinical trials are scarce with warfarin as the primary comparator, and their impact on health outcomes in observational studies has not always been consistent.
Do direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin improve effectiveness and safety compared to acenocoumarol in patients ≥40 years old with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort
Do direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin improve effectiveness and safety compared to acenocoumarol in patients ≥40 years old with atrial fibrillation?
INTRODUCTION: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are first-line drugs for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The introduction of new lines of therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has led to a decreased use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Comparative analyses of DOACs in clinical trials are scarce and the comparator has mostly been warfarin. Their impact on health outcomes in observational studies has not always been consistent. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DOACs and VKAs in patients with AF using Real-World Data (RWD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Population-based retrospective cohort study using RWD from actual practice. Period: January 2012-December 2020. Inclusion criteria: patients with AF who had not taken OACs in the previous 12 months. Exclusion criteria: <40 years, with severe mitral stenosis, or valvular heart disease or aortic and/or mitral valve procedures. Data source: The Andalusian Population Health Database, Spain. Outcome measures: a) Effectiveness: ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack, systemic and pulmonary embolism, and death; b) Safety: gastrointestinal and intracranial haemorrhaging; Independent variables: age, sex, comorbidities, medication and health resource use, CHA2DS2-VASC, HAS-BLED, and analytical tests. Statistical analysis: crude incidence analysis, survival models, Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression analysis adjusted for possible confounding and paired analysis by propensity score matching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montero-Balosa et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) and warfarin vs. Acenocoumarol was evaluated on Combined effectiveness (transient ischaemic attack, systemic embolism, pulmonary embolism, ischaemic stroke, all-cause mortality) and combined safety (gastrointestinal and intracranial haemorrhages). The SIESTA-A study protocol describes a planned retrospective cohort analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation, with no clinical results available yet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: