Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective . Vision restoration approaches, such as prosthetics and optogenetics, provide visual perception to blind individuals in clinical settings. Yet their effectiveness in daily life remains a challenge. Stereotyped quantitative tests used in clinical trials often fail to translate into practical, everyday applications. On the one hand, assessing real-life benefits during clinical trials is complicated by environmental complexity, reproducibility issues, and safety concerns. On the other hand, predicting behavioral benefits of restorative therapies in naturalistic environments may be a crucial step before starting clinical trials to minimize patient discomfort and unmet expectations. Approach . To address this, we leverage advancements in virtual reality technology to conduct a fully immersive and ecologically valid task within a physical artificial street environment. As a case study, we assess the impact of the visual field size in simulated artificial vision for common outdoor tasks. Main results . We show that a wide visual angle (45°) enhances participants’ ability to navigate and solve tasks more effectively, safely, and efficiently. Moreover, it promotes their learning and generalization capability. Concurrently, it changes the visual exploration behavior and facilitates a more accurate mental representation of the environment. Further increasing the visual angle beyond this value does not yield significant additional improvements in most metrics. Significance . We present a methodology combining augmented reality with a naturalistic environment, enabling participants to perceive the world as patients with retinal implants would and to interact physically with it. Combining augmented reality in naturalistic environments is a valuable framework for low vision and vision restoration research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hinrichs et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: