PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026Frontiers in Psychiatry0 citationsOpen Access

Factors associated with emotional regulation self-efficacy in adolescents hospitalized for intentional drug and chemical overdose: a cross-sectional study

TLTing LiAnhui Medical UniversityNCNengyue ChenNanjing Children's HospitalSZShaohua ZhangNanjing Children's Hospital

Key Points

  • This study aims to investigate the relationships between regulatory emotional self-efficacy and various psychosocial factors in adolescents hospitalized due to intentional drug and chemical overdose.
  • 145 adolescents aged 10–13 hospitalized for intentional drug overdose were studied from July 2023 to June 2025.
  • Participants completed assessment scales for regulatory emotional self-efficacy, depressive symptoms, social support, and family functioning.
  • Data analysis included multiple linear regression to identify associations between variables.
  • Females scored significantly lower in regulatory emotional self-efficacy than males (t=3.637, P=0.001).
  • Self-efficacy was negatively correlated with depressive symptoms (r=-0.47, P<0.001) and positively with social support (r=0.50, P<0.001).
  • Depressive symptoms, social support, and family functioning showed significant independent associations with regulatory emotional self-efficacy (all P<0.001).

Abstract

Background Intentional drug and chemical overdose (IDCO) represents a frequent, high-risk form of self-harm among adolescents, often involving accessible substances and carrying significant medical and psychological sequelae. Regulatory emotional self-efficacy (RESE), a core indicator of an individual’s capacity for emotional management, is posited to critically influence both the motivation for and the clinical trajectory following IDCO. However, research specifically examining RESE within this distinct, high-acuity IDCO population remains scarce, limiting the development of targeted psychosocial interventions. Objective This study aimed to explore the correlations between RESE and depressive symptoms, social support, family functioning, and clinical indicators, and to identify factors associated with RESE. As a secondary exploratory aim, we examined factors associated with clinical severity. Methods A total of 145 adolescents aged 10–13 years hospitalized for Intentional drug and chemical overdose between July 2023 and June 2025 were enrolled. Participants were stratified by sex into female (n=99) and male (n=46) groups, and by drug category into psychotropic, neurological/antiepileptic, antibiotic/cold remedy, pesticide/household chemical, and other groups. All participants completed the Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale, Depressive Symptom Scale, Social Support Scale, and Family Functioning Scale. Results Regulatory emotional self-efficacy scores were significantly lower in females than in males (t=3.637, P = 0.001). Significant differences in self-efficacy scores were observed across drug categories (F = 3.456, P = 0.009), with the pesticide/household chemical group scoring the lowest. Regulatory emotional self-efficacy was negatively correlated with depressive symptoms (r=-0.47, P0.001), positively correlated with social support (r=0.50, P0.001). Multiple linear regression identified depressive symptoms (t=-3.372, P = 0.001), social support (t=3.876, P0.001), and family functioning (t=-3.423, P = 0.001) as factors independently associated with regulatory emotional self-efficacy. In secondary exploratory analyzes, clinical severity was positively associated with depressive symptoms (OR = 1.578, 95% CI: 1.234-2.019, P0.001), and pesticide/household chemical exposure was associated with higher odds of moderate-to-severe clinical presentation (OR = 3.434, 95% CI: 1.401-8.417, P = 0.007). Conclusion RESE shows significant independent associations with depressive symptoms, social support, and family functioning in adolescents hospitalized for Intentional drug and chemical overdose. These cross-sectional findings identify potential targets for future prospective intervention research but do not directly support claims of improved management efficacy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153790b5d9c58d83e8bfachttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1793066
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper