Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Given two stationary random processes <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">x_1 (t)</tex> and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">x_2 (t)</tex> , the cross-correlation property of interest is the following: If one of the two processes is distorted by an instantaneous nonlinear device, then the cross correlation after the distortion is proportional to the cross-correlation function prior to the distortion. Using an expansion of the second-order joint probability distribution <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p(x_1, x_2)</tex> introduced by Barrett and Lampard, a necessary and sufficient condition for the above cross-correlation property is given in terms of requirements on the expansion coefficients. In certain cases, the constant of proportionality involved in the cross-correlation property is equal to the "equivalent gain" of the nonlinear device as defined by Booton. A necessary and sufficient condition for these two constants to be identical is formulated in terms of the expansion coefficients of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p(x_1, x_2)</tex> . The class of distributions satisfying this condition is a subclass of the set of distributions for which the cross-correlation property is valid.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jerram L. Brown (1957) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: