Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares exercise boredom in forest bathing and gym settings, indicating environmental impact on physical activity.
Objective Exercise boredom is a pervasive barrier to physical activity adherence; however, no study has examined it as a primary outcome using a multidimensional boredom measure with temporal tracking across exercise settings. This study compared forest bathing and indoor gym exercise on exercise-related boredom, affective responses, perceived restorativeness, and adherence intention. Design This is a randomized, counterbalanced crossover trial with repeated measures at four time points. Methods A total of 34 healthy university students (21 male and 13 female students; mean age = 21.3 years) completed two intensity-matched, 30-min walking sessions (forest-path and indoor treadmill conditions) in a counterbalanced order, separated by a washout period of 7- to 10-days between them. The primary outcome was exercise boredom, assessed using an 8-item adapted Multidimensional State Boredom Scale (MSBS; Cronbach’s α = 0.87–0.89). Data were analyzed using a 2 (condition) × 4 (time) repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Greenhouse–Geisser correction. Results A significant condition × time interaction emerged for boredom [ F (1.75, 57.62) = 7.17, p = 0.003, partial η 2 = 0.179]. Post-exercise boredom was lower after forest bathing compared to gym exercise [mean difference = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (0.17, 1.03), d = 0.49]. Boredom decreased during forest walking but increased during treadmill walking ( p < 0.001). Forest bathing resulted in higher affective valence ( d = 0.43), greater perceived restorativeness ( d = 1.84), and stronger adherence intention ( d = 0.37). Ratings of perceived exertion confirmed equivalent exercise intensity. Conclusion Exercise boredom is not merely an individual disposition but a context-sensitive response that is environmentally modifiable. Nature-based exercise warrants further investigation as a strategy for sustaining physical activity engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: