Key result
Antiischemic agents are widely used for NSTE-ACS symptom control, but the evidence supporting their use in this specific condition remains less clear cut compared to stable CAD or STE-ACS.
Why the study?
What is the role and evidence for antiischemic agents in the management of NSTE-ACS?
What is the role and evidence for antiischemic agents in the management of NSTE-ACS?
This review summarizes the available antiischemic therapies for NSTE-ACS, emphasizing the need for more specific evidence in this patient population.
Evidence for antiischemic agents in NSTE-ACS is less robust than in other ACS; leaves open the need for dedicated trials to guide use.
Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is the commonest acute presentation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Mortality and morbidity of the condition has improved substantially over the last few decades as a result of the cumulative effect of multiple interventions acting via different mechanisms. Despite a significant increase in the rate of coronary intervention, medical therapy continues to retain a central role in the treatment of NSTE-ACS particularly in frail patients where revascularization is inappropriate or when it is incomplete. Several antiischemic agents have been used in the treatment of the condition. Beta blockers are often the first-line choice with calcium channel blockers and nitrates being used as an alternative when beta blockers are contraindicated, or as an addition to achieve optimal symptom control. Newer agents, such as nicorandil, ivabradine, and ranolazine have also been used in refractory cases. Although most of these agents have been extensively studied in large randomized controlled trials in patients with stable CAD or ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (STE-ACS), the evidence supporting their use in NSTE-ACS is less clear cut. In this article, we review various drugs available for controlling ischemia and the latest evidence in support of their use in NSTE-ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kadri et al. (2010) conducted a review in Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Antiischemic agents was evaluated. Antiischemic agents are widely used for NSTE-ACS symptom control, but the evidence supporting their use in this specific condition remains less clear cut compared to stable CAD or STE-ACS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: