With the continuous implementation of the national dual carbon target and the refined control of operating costs in civil buildings, the issue of cleaning and regenerating high-consumption air filter materials in civil buildings has become a hot research topic. This study took rGO air filter material as the research object from the perspective of commercial cost optimization and, using water as the cleaning medium, compared and analyzed the changes in filtration efficiency, airflow resistance, comprehensive performance, and full dimension economy during five cycles of regeneration using water cleaning and ultrasonic cleaning methods. The results showed that ultrasonic cleaning can better maintain the microscopic morphology and structural integrity of the rGO filter, exhibiting more stable filtration performance and slower performance attenuation during repeated regeneration. After the first cleaning, the filtration effectiveness following water cleaning was higher than that following ultrasonic cleaning, with filtration efficiencies 1.21%, 0.18%, and 1.11% higher for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0, respectively. After the 2nd to 5th cleaning cycles, the filtration efficiency following ultrasonic cleaning was higher than that following water cleaning, with increases of 3.79%, 2.18%, 2.20%, and 6.49% for PM10; 3.20%, 1.22%, 2.96%, and 3.25% for PM2.5; and 1.90%, 2.02%, 2.02%, and 6.21% for PM1.0, respectively. The counting filtration efficiency of the ultrasonic cleaning method is relatively high for particle sizes roughly between 0.35 and 2.5 μm, while the difference between large particles is small. The filtration resistance value of the water cleaning method is higher than that of the ultrasonic cleaning method. The QF of the ultrasonic cleaning is always higher than that of the water cleaning method. After five washes, the QF values of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 under the ultrasonic cleaning method were 2.26, 2.04, and 2.37 times higher, respectively, than those under the water washing cleaning method. When the replacement frequency is the same, the cost of using ultrasonic cleaning is lower than that of water cleaning. It can effectively reduce the operating costs and asset replacement costs of the fresh air system and is more suitable for the landing and long-term cost control needs of large-scale civil construction projects. Therefore, it is recommended that ultrasonic cleaning be used to recycle rGO air filter materials. These findings provide reference value for the large-scale use of rGO air filter materials and the creation of low-carbon indoor environments.
Zhang et al. (Sun,) studied this question.