Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Numerical parametric analysis reveals how curvature affects impact behaviour in CFRP shell panels, indicating implications for design.
In this study, the 33.5 J low-velocity impact (LVI) behaviour of unidirectional T300/5208 CFRP cylindrical shell panels with a 40-ply [45/0/−45/90]5s layup was investigated using Abaqus/Explicit under the effect of the curvature-height parameter (f = 0–62.5 mm; a1–a6). To address the limitation of the previous single-block approach in not being able to represent delamination, the study was carried out on two models: an intralaminar-only (SC8R single-block) model and an intralaminar + interlaminar model containing nine cohesive interfaces. Quantitative results: In the intralaminar-only model, the maximum contact force peaks at a3 (f = 25 mm), with 13,192 N, representing a 13.7% increase relative to the flat panel; whereas in the intralaminar + interlaminar model, the force is highest at a2 (f = 12.5 mm), with 14663 N, and decreases monotonically with curvature (10,765 N at a6). Failure mechanism: In the intralaminar-only model, the dominant intralaminar mode is matrix tensile damage (DAMAGEMT); in the intralaminar + interlaminar model, interlaminar separation (CSDMG) governs the total damage, and the initiated delamination area reaches its minimum at a4 (f = 37.5 mm), with 7282 mm2, and its maximum at a5, with 9821 mm2. Thus, a curvature-dependent delamination-minimum regime arises that differs from the a3 optimum of the intralaminar-only model. An impact performance index (DPI) and its surface-area-corrected derivative, DPI* = DPI/ζ, were applied separately for both models. It was shown that delamination systematically lowers the performance level and shifts the optimum curvature window. All findings are comparative trends within a single numerical framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onur Gök (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: