Quasi-experimental study shows enhanced science motivation and achievement in sixth-grade students via AI tools.
Despite the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in science education, little is known about the motivational value of AI-supported digital tools in upper-primary ecosystem science learning. This quasi-experimental study examined whether participation in a teacher-guided digital ecosystems unit integrating AI-supported elements and interactive non-AI tools was associated with sixth-grade students’ ecosystem achievement, interest in science, attitudes toward science, and science self-efficacy. Four sixth-grade classes in an Israeli elementary school (123 students) participated. The experimental group completed six 45-min lessons; the control group studied the same content without the AI-supported components and integrated digital sequence. Students completed pretest and posttest questionnaires and an ecosystem achievement test; the experimental group also completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 students from the experimental group. Baseline-adjusted analyses indicated higher post-intervention achievement and motivational outcomes in the experimental group. Boys reported higher interest and self-efficacy than girls, and mothers’ education was positively associated with interest and attitudes. Within the experimental group, satisfaction was positively related to all motivational outcomes and significantly predicted self-efficacy. Interview themes highlighted visualization, feedback, collaboration, and occasional cognitive and technical challenges. Overall, this teacher-guided instructional package was associated with more favorable outcomes under classroom conditions in schools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kortam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: