Empirical examination reveals how voluntary regulations enhance innovation in heavily polluting enterprises, suggesting cooperative governance strategies.
Against the backdrop of environmental governance systems transitioning from command-and-control to multi-stakeholder collaboration, elucidating the mechanisms and pathways through which voluntary environmental regulations influence green technological innovation in heavily polluting enterprises holds significant implications for advancing green innovation and high-quality development. This paper systematically examines the synergistic mechanisms of command-and-control versus voluntary environmental regulations on green technological innovation in heavily polluting enterprises, utilising data from listed companies in China’s high-pollution industries between 2008 and 2024. Unlike previous studies predominantly focused on the impact of a single regulatory type, this study reveals an interactive effect between the two: moderate command-and-control regulation provides essential institutional support for voluntary environmental regulation, such as ISO 14001 certification, thereby generating a complementary enhancement effect. However, overly stringent command-and-control regulation diverts innovation resources from enterprises, thereby suppressing the incentive effect of voluntary regulation. This conclusion transcends the traditional analytical paradigm within environmental regulation theory that treats command-and-control and voluntary regulations as mutually exclusive opposites, revealing instead a dynamic relationship where both synergistic and constraining effects coexist. This discovery provides crucial theoretical underpinnings and empirical evidence for constructing an environmental governance system that combines command-and-control constraints with flexible incentives, ensuring compatibility between policy objectives and corporate behaviour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: