Assesses hydrological and economic performance of SUDS in Madrid, indicating substantial reuse potential.
Although Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) are widely recognised as essential components of resilient urban water management, the large-scale planning and evaluation of such systems remain challenging. This study assesses the hydrological and economic performance of SUDS in Madrid (Spain) under the SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5 climate scenarios, applying a dual-scale methodology based on the Curve Number (CN) model. At the catchment scale, SUDS show substantial potential for irrigation reuse, with runoff-rich catchments reaching hydrological saturation earlier (plateau at r ≈ 0.4) and runoff-limited catchments stabilising at higher implementation levels (plateau at r ≈ 0.6). At the parcel scale, partial-coverage configurations (50% irrigation coverage) outperform full-coverage solutions (100% irrigation coverage), achieving maximum retention levels of 70% in SSP1-2.6 and 50% in SSP5-8.5 while requiring less surface area (10–15%). From an economic perspective, positive net present values (NPVs), acceptable internal rates of return (IRRs), and feasible payback periods occur only at very low retention levels (r < 0.05), with financial performance declining rapidly as storage capacity increases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monachese et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: