This research reformulates Young's equation, revealing molecular origins of wetting in water, suggesting important implications for surface design.
Young’s equation provides a remarkably successful macroscopic description of wetting, yet its molecular origin─particularly for water─has remained elusive for over two centuries. Here, we make this molecular basis explicit by establishing a thermodynamic bridge that connects interfacial free energies, density fluctuations, and hydrogen-bond energetics. This leads to a molecular wetting coefficient, ωm, that quantifies how an interface compensates the intrinsic energetic cost of hydrogen-bond defects relative to bulk water. Specifically, ωm measures the water-stabilization ability of the surface─the interaction energy experienced by hydration water at the interface─and compares this interaction with water’s intrinsic energetic scale (the defect interaction threshold, DIT), thus defining when wetting is favorable or not. Across a broad and continuous spectrum of hydrophilicities, spanning chemically diverse experimental and model surfaces, we show that macroscopic contact angles collapse onto a single universal master curve when expressed through ωm, reflecting a common underlying free-energy balance. We further show that this collapse reflects a unified thermodynamic framework connecting interfacial free energies, density fluctuations, and molecular energetics across scales. Thus, wetting arises from the interplay between surface chemistry and water: while the surface determines the interaction energy experienced by interfacial molecules, the liquid sets the criterion separating wetting from nonwetting behavior by imposing a threshold that emerges from the intrinsic energetic scales of its hydrogen-bond network. Furthermore, this molecular reformulation closes Young’s and Young–Dupré relations on energetic grounds, establishing a unified and predictive physical link between wetting, adhesion, cavitation, and nanoconfined filling. By anchoring interfacial behavior to water’s intrinsic hydrogen-bond energetic scales, this work provides a transferable molecular framework that recalibrates energetic intuition and guides the rational design of aqueous interfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loubet et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: