Key result
A P-wave duration >140 milliseconds on signal-averaged ECG increased the likelihood of developing atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery by 3.9-fold.
Why the study?
Does preoperative P-wave signal-averaged ECG predict the development of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery?
Cohort (n=130)
Does preoperative P-wave signal-averaged ECG predict the development of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery?
Preoperative P-wave duration measured by signal-averaged ECG is an independent predictor of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support preoperative AF risk stratification after cardiac surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a commonly encountered arrhythmia in clinical practice, and it occurs frequently after cardiac surgery. The P-wave signal-averaged (SA) ECG noninvasively detects atrial conduction delay. Prior studies have described greater P-wave prolongation in patients with a history of AF, but prospective studies have not been performed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled. The P-wave SAECG was recorded before surgery from three orthogonal leads using a sinus P-wave template and a cross-correlation function. The averaged P wave was filtered with a least-squares-fit filter and combined into a vector magnitude, and total P-wave duration was measured. Patients were observed after cardiac surgery for the development of AF. One hundred thirty patients were enrolled, and 33 (25%) developed AF 2.6 +/- 2.0 days after surgery. Patients with AF more often had left ventricular hypertrophy on ECG (P < .05) and had a lower ejection fraction (P < .05). The P-wave duration on the SAECG was significantly longer in the AF patients than in those without AF: 152 +/- 18 versus 139 +/- 17 milliseconds (P < .001). An SAECG P-wave duration > 140 milliseconds predicted AF with sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 55%, positive predictive accuracy of 37%, and negative predictive accuracy of 87%. The likelihood of experiencing AF was increased 3.9-fold if the SAECG P-wave duration was prolonged. P-wave SAECG results were independent of other clinical variables by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The P-wave duration recorded with the SAECG is a potent, accurate, and independent predictor of AF after cardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steinberg et al. (1993) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (n=130). P-wave signal-averaged ECG was evaluated on Development of atrial fibrillation (3.9-fold increased likelihood, p=<.001). A P-wave duration >140 milliseconds on signal-averaged ECG increased the likelihood of developing atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery by 3.9-fold.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: