Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated short-answer marking cannot “guarantee” 100 percent agreement between the marks generated by a software system and marks produced separately by a human. This problem has prevented automated marking systems from being used in high-stake short-answer marking. This paper describes how an automated short-answer marking system, called IndusMarker, can be effectively used to improve teaching and learning in an Object-Oriented Programming course taught at a university. The system is designed for factual answers where there is a clear criterion for answers being right or wrong. The system is based on structure matching, i.e., matching a prespecified structure, developed via a purpose-built structure editor, with the content of the student's answer text.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siddiqi et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: