Systematic review compares hospitalization and safety of RALP and LP in children under 3 years, suggesting RALP offers benefits.
Background: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) represents a common congenital anomaly in infants and young children. While minimally invasive approaches, including laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), have gained acceptance, comparative outcomes in children younger than 3 years have still not been well-established. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RALP versus LP in infants and children younger than 3 years or weighing < 15 kg. Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted through May 2025. Five retrospective cohort studies comprising 272 patients met inclusion criteria (age younger than 3 years or weighing < 15 kg). Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models. Results: Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RALP group compared with LP (mean difference = −1.69 days; 95% CI: −2.71 to −0.67). No statistically significant differences were observed in operative time, complication rates, or success rates between approaches. Conclusions: RALP is associated with significantly reduced hospitalization time compared with LP in infants and young children, while maintaining comparable safety and efficacy profiles. These findings support RALP as a valuable minimally invasive option in this challenging patient population, though larger prospective studies are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szyduczyński et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: