PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026Cancers2 citationsOpen Access

Are There CT Imaging Features That Can Distinguish Primary Pulmonary Squamous Cell Carcinoma from Solitary Lung Metastasis of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma?

View Full Paper
COCamila Vilela de OliveiraCLCorinne C. LiuMMMaría Mayoral

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify CT imaging features that differentiate primary lung squamous cell carcinoma from solitary lung metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Retrospective, single-institution cross-sectional study
  • Included patients with biopsy-proven PLSCC or solitary MHNSCC (N=81) from July 2013 to May 2022
  • Evaluated CT and PET/CT imaging features by at least two radiologists
  • PLSCC was associated with larger tumor size (median 3.3–3.6 cm vs 1.4–1.6 cm, p < 0.001)
  • Post obstructive atelectasis was more common in PLSCC (p = 0.002)
  • MHNSCC presented as smaller peripheral nodules with lower SUVmax (p = 0.01)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Distinguishing primary lung squamous cell carcinoma (PLSCC) from metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (MHNSCC) to the lungs is challenging for pathologists, especially when patients present with a solitary lung nodule. The purpose of this study was to identify CT imaging features that differ between PLSCC from solitary MHNSCC to the lungs, using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and human papillomavirus in situ hybridization analysis as the gold reference standard. Methods: This retrospective, single-institution cross-sectional study included patients with a biopsy-proven PLSCC or solitary MHNSCC from July 2013 to May 2022, who underwent NGS or in situ hybridization, and baseline CT or PET/CT. Each scan was evaluated by at least two radiologists. Nodular, pleural, and ancillary CT features, as well as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) from PET/CTs, were recorded. Associations between imaging features and pathology were examined using either the Wilcoxon rank-sum or Fisher’s exact test. Results: In total, 81 patients were included (median 66 years; 64 male); 36/81 (44%) had PLSCC and 45/81 (56%) had MHNSCC. PLSCC was associated with a larger size (median, 3.3–3.6 cm vs. 1.4–1.6 cm, p < 0.001), and the presence of post obstructive atelectasis (p = 0.002), pleural retraction (p < 0.001), pleural tags (p = 0.02), and pleural surface involvement (p = 0.02). MHNSCC presented as smaller peripheral nodules (p = 0.003) with lower SUVmax (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Several CT imaging features as well as SUVmax from PET/CT were significantly different between PLSCC and solitary MHNSCC and their potential discriminatory ability warrants evaluation in future studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oliveira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153bdfb5d9c58d83e8d527https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18111703
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in lung squamous cell carcinoma of 3 cm or less in diameter2017 · 9 citations
  2. 2Comprehensive Next-Generation Sequencing Unambiguously Distinguishes Separate Primary Lung Carcinomas From Intrapulmonary Metastases: Comparison with Standard Histopathologic Approach2019 · 110 citations
  3. 3Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis from Head and Neck Cancer: Predictive Factors and Imaging Features2021 · 2 citations
  4. 4Distinguishing Second Primary Tumors From Lung Metastases in Patients With Head and Neck Sauamous Cell Carcinoma1998 · 179 citations
  5. 5Bronchogenic carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation.1994 · 118 citations