Key result
ICD shocks promote HF and myocardial stunning, driving the need to limit unnecessary therapies.
Why the study?
ICD shocks are associated with increased mortality with a dose-response effect, though reducing electrical therapy burden improves prognosis.
While ICD shocks are life-saving, they cause significant myocardial injury and pro-arrhythmic effects, emphasizing the clinical importance of minimizing unnecessary electrical therapies.
Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended to prevent the risk of sudden cardiac death. However, shocks are associated with an increased mortality with a dose response effect, and a strategy of reducing electrical therapy burden improves the prognosis of implanted patients. We review the mechanisms of defibrillation and its consequences, including cell damage, metabolic remodeling, calcium metabolism anomalies, and inflammatory and pro-fibrotic remodeling. Electrical shocks do save lives, but also promote myocardial stunning, heart failure, and pro-arrhythmic effects as seen in electrical storms. Limiting unnecessary implantations and therapies and proposing new methods of defibrillation in the future are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clémenty et al. (2021) conducted a review in Sudden cardiac death risk / ICD implantation. Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) / Electrical shocks was evaluated. Electrical shocks from implantable cardiac defibrillators save lives but promote myocardial stunning, heart failure, and pro-arrhythmic effects, highlighting the need to limit unnecessary therapies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: