PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 2019BJU International114 citations

‘Fake News’ in urology: evaluating the accuracy of articles shared on social media in genitourinary malignancies

View Full Paper
MAMuhannad AlsyoufLoma Linda UniversityPSPhillip StokesLoma Linda UniversityDHDan HurLoma Linda University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of the most popular articles on social media platforms pertaining to genitourinary malignancies, and to identify the prevalence of misinformation available to patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 10 most shared articles on popular social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, and Reddit) were identified for prostate cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, testis cancer, and PSA testing using a social media analysis tool (August 2017 and August 2018). Articles were reviewed for accuracy by comparing the article information against available scientific research and consensus data. They were classified as accurate, misleading or inaccurate. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for statistical comparison. RESULTS: Articles pertaining to prostate cancer were the most shared across all social media platforms (399 000 shares), followed by articles pertaining to kidney cancer (115 000), bladder cancer (17 894), PSA testing (8827) and testicular cancer (7045). The prevalence of inaccurate or misleading articles was high: prostate cancer, 7/10 articles; kidney, 3/10 articles; bladder, 2/10 articles; testis, 2/10 articles; and PSA testing, 1/10 articles. There was a significantly higher average number of shares for inaccurate (54 000 shares; P < 0.01) and misleading articles (7040 shares; P < 0.01) than for accurate articles (1900 shares). Inaccurate articles were 28 times more likely to be shared than factual articles. CONCLUSION: Misleading or inaccurate information on genitourinary malignancies is commonly shared on social media. This study highlights the importance of directing patients to appropriate cancer resources and potentially argues for oversight by the medical and technology communities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alsyouf et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153f13814bf8ec9a4e4b16https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14787
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election2017 · 6,731 citations
  2. 2The spread of medical fake news in social media – The pilot quantitative study2018 · 415 citations
  3. 3Use of social media in urology: data from the A merican U rological A ssociation ( AUA )2013 · 148 citations
  4. 4The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis2014 · 711 citations
  5. 5Complementary Medicine, Refusal of Conventional Cancer Therapy, and Survival Among Patients With Curable Cancers2018 · 339 citations