Key result
Large-footprint dual-energy catheter achieves 100% first-pass PVI with low procedural complications.
Why the study?
A new large-footprint dual-energy catheter switching between PFA and RFA with 3D mapping integration has been introduced, but its safety, efficacy, and procedural characteristics in atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia ablation required evaluation.
Does a large-footprint dual-energy catheter (PFA/RFA) achieve safe and effective acute procedural outcomes in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia?
Cohort (n=102)
Does a large-footprint dual-energy catheter (PFA/RFA) achieve safe and effective acute procedural outcomes in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia?
The large-footprint dual-energy catheter is feasible and safe for achieving acute pulmonary vein isolation and complex atrial lesion sets in patients with atrial arrhythmias.
Does not support practice change; leaves open comparative efficacy versus standard catheters in randomized trials.
Background: A new large-footprint catheter that switches between pulsed field ablation (PFA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and integrates with a novel 3-dimensional (3D) mapping platform has been introduced. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and procedural characteristics of the large-footprint dual-energy catheter in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing left (LA) and right atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardias were analyzed. All patients were enrolled in the prospective TRUST Registry (NCT05521451). Results: 102 patients (37 women [36%]; median age 68 years [60-75]; median left ventricular ejection fraction 60% [53-60]) were included; 42 (41%) underwent first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and 57 (56%) repeat PVI. Median procedure and mapping times were 91 minutes (78-114) and 15 minutes (11.9-21.7), respectively; median 3D LA volume was 165 mL (142-199).In 75 patients (42 index, 33 repeat procedures), pulmonary veins were targeted, and first-pass isolation was achieved in all using PFA only (median ablation 25 minutes [16-34]). Additional LA lines were applied in 87 of 102 (85%): anterior (34, 25 of 34 [73%] PFA + RFA), mitral isthmus (27, 18 of 27 [67%] PFA + RFA; 5 of 27 [18%] with PFA in the coronary sinus), posterior box (45, PFA only), and roof (23, PFA only). All lines were bidirectionally blocked, and posterior boxes isolated. A cavotricuspid isthmus line was created in 36 of 102 (35%; 30 of 36 [83%] RFA only). Procedural complications occurred in 3 of 102 (2.9%). Conclusion: The large-footprint dual-energy catheter enables safe and effective PVI, repeat PVI, and creation of complex left and right atrial lesion sets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
My et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia (n=102). Large-footprint lattice-tip dual-energy catheter (PFA and RFA) was evaluated on First-pass pulmonary vein isolation. The large-footprint dual-energy catheter achieved first-pass pulmonary vein isolation in 100% of targeted patients, with a procedural complication rate of 2.9%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: