Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems generate real-time transcriptions, but often miss nuances that human interpreters capture. While ASR is useful in many contexts, interpreters - who already use ASR tools such as Dragon - add critical value, especially in sensitive settings such as diplomatic meetings where subtle language is key. Human interpreters not only perceive these nuances but can adjust in real-time, improving accuracy, while ASR handles basic transcription tasks. However, ASR systems introduce a delay that does not align with real-time interpretation needs. The user-perceived latency (UPL) of ASR systems differs from that of interpretation because it measures the time between speech and transcription delivery. To address this, we propose a new approach to measuring delay in ASR systems and validate if they are usable in live interpretation scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arriaga et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: