Key result
Strain rate imaging revealed significant changes in left atrial deformation across stages of LV diastolic dysfunction, such as lower E-Sr in mild dysfunction versus normal (0.62 vs 1.20 s⁻¹, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does left atrial myocardial function measured by strain rate imaging correlate with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in subjects with preserved LVEF?
Cross-Sectional (n=118)
Does left atrial myocardial function measured by strain rate imaging correlate with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in subjects with preserved LVEF?
Quantification of left atrial myocardial function using strain rate imaging can detect early changes in left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with preserved ejection fraction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support strain rate imaging for early diastolic detection; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice in preserved LVEF.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between left atrial (LA) myocardial function and left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction in subjects with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: The study included a group of 118 hypertensive patients and normal subjects. LV diastolic dysfunction was classified into 4 groups: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Peak strain rates in systole (S-Sr), early diastole (E-Sr), and late diastole (A-Sr) were obtained from Doppler-derived strain rate imaging to evaluate LA myocardial deformation. RESULTS: No significant difference in LA dimension was observed in subjects with different degrees of LV diastolic dysfunction, although LA myocardial strain rate parameters were all significantly different across the 4 groups (all with P < 0.001). Compared with patients of normal diastolic function, the mild diastolic dysfunction group had significantly lower E-Sr (0.62 ± 0.18 s⁻¹ vs 1.20 ± 0.38 s⁻¹, P < 0.001) and S-Sr (0.78 ± 0.16 s⁻¹ vs 0.94 ± 0.22 s⁻¹, P < 0.001) but increased A-Sr (1.14 ± 0.29 s⁻¹ vs 1.00 ± 0.23 s⁻¹, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: By using strain rate imaging, significant changes of LA deformation in response to different stages of LV diastolic dysfunction were detected in subjects with preserved LVEF. Quantification of LA myocardial function rather than LA size may have the potential to predict early LV diastolic dysfunction in subjects with preserved LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension with preserved LVEF (n=118). Doppler-derived strain rate imaging vs. Normal diastolic function was evaluated on Peak strain rates in systole (S-Sr), early diastole (E-Sr), and late diastole (A-Sr) (p=<0.001). Strain rate imaging revealed significant changes in left atrial deformation across stages of LV diastolic dysfunction, such as lower E-Sr in mild dysfunction versus normal (0.62 vs 1.20 s⁻¹, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: