Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Among the Tardigrada (Mammalia, Xenarthra), terrestrial sloths were very abundant in the South American fauna during the Cenozoic and were especially well represented in the Lujanian (late Pleistocene–early Holocene) fauna. The last systematic revision of the Pleistocene genus Lestodon from Argentina, Bolivia and Uruguay recognized two species: L. armatus Gervais, 1855 Gervais, P., 1855. Recherches sur les mammifères fossils de l′Amérique méridionale, Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie 3 (6) (1855), pp. 330–338. [Google Scholar] and L. australis Kraglievich, 1934 Kraglievich, L., 1934. La antigüedad pliocena de las faunas de Monte Hermoso y Chapadmalal, deducida de su comparación con las que le precedieron y sucedieron. Buenos Aires: Imprenta “El Siglo Ilustrado”; 1934. p. 133, . [Google Scholar]. In this paper we revise the species of Lestodon and assess the possibility of sexual dimorphism in body size. The results obtained from a morphological study and morphometrical analysis of the skull do not support a distinction between the two species. Estimations of body mass based on tibial measurements did not support the case for size sexual dimorphism in Lestodon. Nor can this be observed in cranial dimensions. Consequently, it is proposed that the only valid species of the genus is L. armatus, the type species. We provide an emended diagnosis for L. armatus taking into account features found in specimens previously assigned to L. australis. Although the largest specimens of the genus Lestodon are from the current territory of Argentina, the average size of specimens from Uruguay is marginally larger.http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Czerwonogora et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: