Key result
Four weeks of high-intensity resistance training significantly decreased arterial compliance in healthy young men without changing resting circulating plasma vasoconstrictor levels.
Why the study?
Does high-intensity resistance training reduce arterial compliance and alter plasma vasoconstrictor levels in healthy young men?
Does high-intensity resistance training reduce arterial compliance and alter plasma vasoconstrictor levels in healthy young men?
High-intensity resistance training decreases arterial compliance in healthy young men, but this reduction is not associated with changes in circulating plasma vasoconstrictors such as endothelin-1.
High-intensity resistance training may impair arterial compliance independent of vasoconstrictors; leaves open mechanisms and clinical relevance.
Arterial compliance (AC) is an index of the elasticity of large arteries. Endothelial dysfunction has been reported to result in reduced arterial compliance, which represents increased arterial stiffness. A reduction in AC is elicited by high-intensity resistance training, however the mechanisms are obscure. Because a single bout of resistance exercise causes a transient increase in circulating plasma endothelin-1 in humans, some vasoconstrictors may play a role in the mechanisms. The present study aimed to investigate whether resistance training-induced decrease in AC is associated with changes in circulating vasoconstrictors levels in young men. Young sedentary men were assigned to control (n=5) or training (n=9) groups. The training group performed four-week high-intensity resistance training (weight training exercise; three sessions/week). We measured AC and plasma levels of endothelin-1, angiotensin II, and norepinephrine before and after intervention. Resistance training significantly decreased AC, whereas the changes in plasma levels of neither endothelin-1, nor angiotensin II, nor norepinephrine were significantly different between the control and the training groups. Moreover, we found no significant correlations between changes in circulating plasma levels (endothelin-1, angiotensin II, and norepinephrine) and in the AC. Despite of no alteration of the resting circulating plasma levels (endothelin-1, etc.), we cannot exclude a possibility that the tissue/local concentrations of vasoconstrictors (endothelin-1, etc.) around the vessels might be increased and also involved in a reduction of AC in the training group. Taken together, the present results suggest that circulating vasoconstrictors (endothelin-1, etc.) in plasma are not involved in a reduction in AC by the resistance training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tagawa et al. (2018) studied Healthy sedentary men (n=14). High-intensity resistance training (biceps curls) vs. Control (no training) was evaluated on Arterial compliance (10^-2 mm2/mmHg) (p=<0.05). Four weeks of high-intensity resistance training significantly decreased arterial compliance in healthy young men without changing resting circulating plasma vasoconstrictor levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: