Key result
Protocol details methodology to evaluate clopidogrel cost-effectiveness versus other antiplatelets in ACS patients undergoing PCI.
Why the study?
ACS management and procedures like PCI strain healthcare resources, and the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel compared with other antiplatelet drugs needs evaluation.
Is clopidogrel cost-effective compared to other antiplatelet drugs in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Systematic Review
Is clopidogrel cost-effective compared to other antiplatelet drugs in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
This is a protocol for a systematic review to assess the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel versus other antiplatelet drugs in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.
Protocol for clopidogrel cost-effectiveness review in ACS-PCI; leaves open comparative value pending synthesis completion.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review will assess the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). INTRODUCTION: Antiplatelet drugs, including clopidogrel, ticagrelor, prasugrel, and aspirin, are crucial in managing ACS, preventing ischemia, and, ultimately, death in PCI patients. Clopidogrel is the main treatment for those who have undergone PCI, used either alone or with aspirin. The incidence of ACS is rising globally, and is a major cause of premature death for millions. ACS management involves continuous medical therapy and costly procedures such as PCI, significantly straining health care resources. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies will be eligible for inclusion if they report on the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in patients with ACS compared with other antiplatelet drugs. METHODS: This systematic review will adhere to the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of economic evaluation evidence. A preliminary search was conducted of MEDLINE (PubMed) using MeSH terms. Two independent reviewers will screen records at the title/abstract level, followed by full-text screening. Two reviewers will then assess methodological quality and extract data as per JBI guidelines. The JBI Dominance Ranking Matrix for economic evaluations will be used to summarize and compare the included studies. The cost-effectiveness measures will be incremental cost, incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained, or incremental cost per disability-adjusted life year averted. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to appraise the certainty of economic evidence, such as using resources and expenditure, for incorporating the results into the decision-making process. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024504614.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abidi et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Clopidogrel vs. Other antiplatelet drugs was evaluated on Cost-effectiveness (incremental cost, incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained, or incremental cost per disability-adjusted life year averted). This systematic review protocol outlines the methodology to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel versus other antiplatelets in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: