Key result
Prosthesis-patient mismatch predicts structural dysfunction of aortic valve bioprostheses over four years.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to identify predictors of biological aortic valve prosthesis dysfunction in the long-term period following surgical treatment.
Does prosthesis-patient mismatch predict accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses?
Cohort (n=74)
Does prosthesis-patient mismatch predict accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses?
p-value: p=<0.005
Prosthesis-patient mismatch is a significant predictor of long-term structural dysfunction in biological aortic valve prostheses, emphasizing the need for optimal prosthesis sizing during surgery.
OBJECTIVE. Identification of predictors of dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses in the long-term period after surgical treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS. We analyzed the completed treatment cases for the period from 2015 to 2020 and echocardiography data of 74 patients (42 men and 32 women) with an average age of 67.0±4.2 years with bioprostheses implanted in the aortic position. The average follow-up period was 4 years. The transaortic flow velocity, the average and peak transvalvular gradients, the area of the effective opening of the prosthesis, the myocardium mass index, the thickness and mobility of the cusp of the biovalve were evaluated. The presence of the pronounced PPM in a patient was determined at iEOA values less than 0.65 cm 2 /m 2 , moderate - at values from 0.65 to 0.85 cm 2 /m 2 , mild - up to 0.85 cm 2 /m 2 . RESULTS. PPM was recorded in 27% of cases. Structural dysfunction was observed in 12.5% of cases, it mainly included stenosis of the bioprosthesis (10%). In 2.5% of cases, reintervention was performed for severe stenosis of the AV bioprosthesis. During the multifactorial analysis, we revealed that PPM was a predictor of the development of structural dysfunction of aortic valve bioprostheses in the long-term period after surgery (p<0.005).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Хубулава et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Patients with bioprostheses implanted in the aortic position (n=74). Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) vs. No prosthesis-patient mismatch was evaluated on Structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses (p=<0.005). Prosthesis-patient mismatch was a significant predictor of the development of structural dysfunction of aortic valve bioprostheses over an average 4-year follow-up (p<0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: