Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Cells of the immune system provide particularly fruitful subjects for the study of lineage commitment. Both T and B lymphocytes undergo complicated patterns of differentiation from uncommitted, nonfunctional precursor cells to highly sophisticated effector cells. The development of the helper T lymphocyte is one of the most elegant examples of this. A little over a decade ago, Mosmann and Coffman (1989) discovered that naive mouse CD4 T helper lymphocytes, upon receiving an antigenic stimulus, differentiate into two distinct subsets defined both by their function and by unique cytokine profiles. These subsets, T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2) (Mosmann et al. 1986; Mosmann and Coffman 1989; Paul and Seder 1994; O’Garra 1998; Rengarajan and Glimcher 2000), are responsible for cell-mediated/inflammatory immunity and humoral responses, respectively (Fig. 1). This division of labor fits nicely with previous demonstrations that an organism tends to mount either a cell-mediated or humoral response, but not both, in response to pathogens. The function of T helper cells can largely be explained by the cytokines they secrete. Cytokines (or lymphokines) are small hormone-like polypeptides that have pleiotrophic biological activities in several cell types. Resting T cells do not transcribe cytokine genes, but they are rapidly induced upon coactivation through the T-cell receptor (TCR) and costimulatory receptors (Lenschow et al. 1996). Much progress has been made in identifying the signaling pathways and transcription factors that control Th1 and Th2 differentiation as shown schematically (Fig. 2a). This review will summarize what is currently known about the signals that regulate lineage commitment in T helper cells with a special focus on three subset-specific transcription factors, T-bet, GATA-3, and c-Maf, responsible for lineage commitment (Fig. 2b).
Glimcher et al. (Sat,) studied this question.