Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper develops an Amazonian critique of Western theories of interpretation as grounded in correspondence between a proposition and a state of affairs, and of truth as correspondence between mind and reality. For the Peruvian Urarina, language has materiality and force and implies a non-arbitrary relationship between signifier and signified, and is moreover based in a very different mode of adequation of person to world: a process grounded in absorption rather than representation. The view that words are effectively consumed by others is exemplified by the baau genre of ritual discourse, in which a healer's speech is literally digested by the patient as a core part of the healing process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harry Walker (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: