Key result
Limited pulmonary vein connections linked to only ~39% arrhythmia freedom after stand-alone PVI in persistent AF.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the circumferential extent of pulmonary vein connections assessed pre-ablation predicts the success rate of stand-alone PVI in persistent AF.
Does the extent of pulmonary vein electrical connections predict the success of stand-alone pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=148)
Single-blind (operator blinded to outcome)
No
Does the extent of pulmonary vein electrical connections predict the success of stand-alone pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 38.6% vs 69.7%
p-value: p=0.002
The circumferential extent of pulmonary vein connections predicts the success of stand-alone pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation, suggesting that patients with limited connections may benefit from first-line adjunctive ablation.
Limited connections may warrant adjunctive ablation consideration in persistent AF; leaves open need for randomized trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Identification of persistent AF (PsAF) patients who may be cured with stand-alone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) would allow more efficient ablation strategies. Intuitively, the benefit of PVI is expected to be lower when PVs are poorly connected, but this assumption has never been tested. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate whether the circumferential extent of PV connections assessed pre-ablation predicts the success rate of PVI. METHODS: Consecutive patients with PsAF undergoing first ablation with stand-alone PVI were included. The extent of PV electrical connection was assessed using a circular mapping catheter and graded as limited, moderate, or extensive, according to tertiles of the mean numbers of bipoles recording PV potentials along the circumference of each vein. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-eight patients were included (age 64 ± 9.7 years, PsAF duration 7.3 ± 7 months). After a mean follow-up of 38.6 ± 7.8 months, freedom from arrhythmia recurrence after last PVI was significantly lower in patients with limited (38.6%), compared to moderate, and extensive PV connections (69.7% and 69%, respectively; p = 0.002). While redo PVI procedures did not significantly affect final ablation outcomes in patients with limited PV connections, a significant incremental arrhythmia-free survival gain was observed with increasing extent of PV connections (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The circumferential extent of PV connections is correlated to the success rate of PVI in patients with PsAF and may be a marker of the contribution of PVs to AF. The finding of limited PV connections may be used to select patients who may benefit from first-line adjunctive ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marchetti et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (n=148). Stand-alone pulmonary vein isolation (limited PV connections) vs. Moderate or extensive PV connections was evaluated on Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence off-antiarrhythmic drugs after last procedure (p=0.002). Stand-alone pulmonary vein isolation resulted in significantly lower freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in persistent atrial fibrillation patients with limited pulmonary vein connections (38.6%) compared to those with moderate (69.7%) or extensive (69.0%) connections.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: