Key result
DOACs reduce stroke risk ~44% vs VKAs in patients with diabetes and NVAF.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs with VKAs for stroke prevention in real-world patients with diabetes and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation through observational studies.
Do direct oral anticoagulants reduce stroke and bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists in real-world patients with diabetes and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Meta-Analysis (n=249,794)
Do direct oral anticoagulants reduce stroke and bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists in real-world patients with diabetes and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
In real-world patients with diabetes and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, DOACs demonstrate superior efficacy for stroke prevention and a better safety profile regarding bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports DOAC preference over VKAs for stroke prevention in diabetes with NVAF; reinforces pooled evidence of efficacy and safety.
Background. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in real-world patients with diabetes and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) through observational studies. Methods. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched up to August 2020 for eligible studies. Outputs were presented as risk ratios (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using a random-effect model. Results. Seven observational studies involving 249,794 diabetic NVAF patients were selected. Compared with VKAs, the use of DOACs was associated with significantly reduced risks of stroke ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mtext>RR</a:mtext> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>0.56</a:mn> </a:math> , 95% CI 0.45-0.70; <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mi>p</c:mi> <c:mo><</c:mo> <c:mn>0.00001</c:mn> </c:math> ), ischemic stroke ( <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mtext>RR</e:mtext> <e:mo>=</e:mo> <e:mn>0.61</e:mn> </e:math> , 95% CI 0.48-0.78; <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <g:mi>p</g:mi> <g:mo><</g:mo> <g:mn>0.0001</g:mn> </g:math> ), stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) ( <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <i:mtext>RR</i:mtext> <i:mo>=</i:mo> <i:mn>0.81</i:mn> </i:math> , 95% CI 0.68-0.95; <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"> <k:mi>p</k:mi> <k:mo>=</k:mo> <k:mn>0.01</k:mn> </k:math> ), myocardial infarction ( <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7"> <m:mtext>RR</m:mtext> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mn>0.69</m:mn> </m:math> , 95% CI 0.55-0.88; <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M8"> <o:mi>p</o:mi> <o:mo>=</o:mo> <o:mn>0.002</o:mn> </o:math> ), major bleeding ( <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M9"> <q:mtext>RR</q:mtext> <q:mo>=</q:mo> <q:mn>0.75</q:mn> </q:math> , 95% CI 0.63-0.90; <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M10"> <s:mi>p</s:mi> <s:mo>=</s:mo> <s:mn>0.002</s:mn> </s:math> ), intracranial hemorrhage ( <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M11"> <u:mtext>RR</u:mtext> <u:mo>=</u:mo> <u:mn>0.50</u:mn> </u:math> , 95% CI 0.44-0.56; <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M12"> <w:mi>p</w:mi> <w:mo><</w:mo> <w:mn>0.00001</w:mn> </w:math> ), and major gastrointestinal bleeding ( <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M13"> <y:mtext>RR</y:mtext> <y:mo>=</y:mo> <y:mn>0.77</y:mn> </y:math> , 95% CI 0.62-0.95; <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M14"> <ab:mi>p</ab:mi> <ab:mo>=</ab:mo> <ab:mn>0.02</ab:mn> </ab:math> ), and a borderline significant decrease in major adverse cardiac events ( <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M15"> <cb:mtext>RR</cb:mtext> <cb:mo>=</cb:mo> <cb:mn>0.87</cb:mn> </cb:math> , 95% CI 0.75-1.00; <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M16"> <eb:mi>p</eb:mi> <eb:mo>=</eb:mo> <eb:mn>0.05</eb:mn> </eb:math> ) in NVAF patients with diabetes. Conclusion. For patients with NVAF and diabetes in real-world clinical settings, DOACs showed superior efficacy and safety profile over VKAs and significantly reduced risks of stroke, ischemic stroke, SSE, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and major gastrointestinal bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Diabetes and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (n=249,794). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Stroke (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.70, p=<0.00001). Direct oral anticoagulants reduced the risk of stroke compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with diabetes and NVAF.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: