Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Urban areas rich in heritage assets grapple with the intricate task of balancing heritage preservation imperatives with the demands of contemporary urban development. This study addresses this complex challenge by proposing a robust framework for evaluating urban sustainability within historic city contexts. Central to this study is the development of an integrated approach that combines Space Syntax analysis with the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) process, offering a novel perspective on assessing urban sustainability within heritage-rich environments. The study employs a systematic review of 60 scholarly papers, covering Space Syntax Analysis, HIA and the Visual Approach Method. This forms the basis for a conceptual framework with four key stages: data collection, Visual Approach Method, 3D modelling and HIA. Through rigorous synthesis, it informs an integrated approach to urban heritage management and sustainable urban development. The findings highlight its value as a tool for navigating the balance between heritage conservation and modern urban needs, benefiting urban planners, decision-makers and heritage advocates. This research helps to bridge the gap between heritage preservation imperatives and urban development demands by presenting a flexible and pragmatic framework. It envisions a future where heritage-rich urban areas thrive as vibrant, sustainable and culturally significant centres, ensuring that the past continues to shape the present and future urban landscapes. Future research efforts should focus on refining and implementing this framework across various historic urban locales, while also exploring the socio-cultural dimensions of heritage preservation and urban sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chakraborty et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: