This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Promoting resilience can reduce the mental health risks of cyberbullying victimisation in adolescents. We conducted a longitudinal cohort study with 9,969 adolescents (Millennium Cohort Study (MCS)) at ages 14-15 (baseline) and 17 (follow-up). We replicated our analyses in 4,240 adolescents (Longitudinal Study of Australian Children). The outcome was psychological distress at follow-up. Cyberbullying victimisation was a single-item question. Aim one identified modifiable resilience factors (exposures) associated with psychological distress. Aim two examined whether these resilience factors (moderators) interacted with the cyberbullying-distress association. 478/1,466 baseline variables were associated with distress after confounder adjustment (aim one). 31/478 potential resilience factors moderated the cyberbullying-distress association. 15 models replicated in the individual (n=8, e.g., happiness with friends), family and friends (n=3, e.g., sexual activities), structural (n=2, e.g., income sources), and learning environment (n=2, e.g., misbehaviour) domains. We identified several factors for further research on developing interventions to reduce adolescent cyberbullying mental health risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kandola et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: