Key result
Intensive remote management leaves ~31% of high-risk patients with device-detected AF unanticoagulated.
Why the study?
The burden of remote monitoring AF alerts and its impact on anticoagulation in patients with device-detected AF needed characterization.
Population
7651 consecutive CIED patients with at least one AF episode undergoing remote monitoring
Design
Cohort study
Follow-up
twelve-months
Authors
Loading...
Persistent anticoagulation gaps in high-risk device-detected AF persist despite remote monitoring; leaves open optimal implementation strategies for prospective study.
Cohort (n=7,651)
Yes
Despite intensive remote monitoring and automated prompts, a substantial proportion of high-risk patients with device-detected AF remain unanticoagulated, highlighting a gap in clinical response pathways.
O’Shea et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Device-detected atrial fibrillation (n=7,651). Remote monitoring with automated software system was evaluated on Unanticoagulated status at 12 months in patients with AF episode ≥ 6 hours and minimum CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2. Despite intensive management via a remote monitoring software system, 31.2% of patients with a device-detected atrial fibrillation episode of ≥6 hours and a minimum CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 remained unanticoagulated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: