Key result
Longer duration of Impella 2.5 support during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention positively correlated with longer coronary care unit stay (rho 0.71) and hospital stay (rho 0.49).
Observational (n=25)
No
Effect estimate: rho 0.71
p-value: p=<0.001
Longer duration of Impella 2.5 circulatory support during high-risk PCI is positively correlated with longer coronary care unit and hospital stays.
Longer Impella support may extend CCU and hospital stays in high-risk PCI; leaves open whether duration should be minimized.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of duration of Impella 2.5 support (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) on hospitalization of patients after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There has been a continuous increase in prevalence of coronary artery disease with more patients needing PCI during acute myocardial infarction. Some of these patients have to undergo high-risk revascularization with circulatory support like the Impella 2.5 device. METHODS: This study was a single center retrospective study of patients admitted to our hospital who required Impella circulatory support during percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients' medical records, cardiac catheterization laboratory and 2-D echocardiography reports were reviewed to ascertain left ventricular ejection fraction, duration of Impella support, Coronary Care Unit (CCU) days and the length of stay in the hospital. A P-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Over a 15-month period, we had 25 patients with 19 males and 6 females. Mean age of the patient cohort was 68 ± 10 years. Mean LVEF of the group was 32 ± 16%. Mean length of hospital stay was 8 ± 8 days and mean CCU stay was 4 ± 4 days. The Impella was successfully inserted in all cases with a median duration of support of 70 minutes (range, 4 - 5760 minutes). Bleeding complication occurred in 8%. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the duration of Impella support and hospital stay was 0.49 (P = 0.023) while it was 0.71 (P = 0.001) between Impella support duration and CCU days. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that there is a positive correlation between the duration of Impella 2.5 circulatory support and hospital stay and/or CCU days. The correlation seems to be stronger with CCU days.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obiora Anusionwu (2012) conducted an observational in High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (n=25). Impella 2.5 circulatory support was evaluated on Correlation between duration of Impella support and coronary care unit (CCU) days (rho 0.71, p=<0.001). Longer duration of Impella 2.5 support during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention positively correlated with longer coronary care unit stay (rho 0.71) and hospital stay (rho 0.49).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: