Key result
LSTM classifier outperforms SVM with ~99% accuracy in distinguishing seizure from non-seizure EEG signals.
Why the study?
Automated artificial intelligence techniques with digital processing can be used to improve the detection and classification of epileptic seizure and non-seizure EEG signals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An LSTM classifier combined with Fast Walsh-Hadamard Transform provides highly accurate automated classification of epileptic seizure EEG signals.
Classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals for humans can be achieved via artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Especially, the EEG signals associated with seizure epilepsy can be detected to distinguish between epileptic and non-epileptic regions. From this perspective, an automated AI technique with a digital processing method can be used to improve these signals. This paper proposes two classifiers: long short-term memory (LSTM) and support vector machine (SVM) for the classification of seizure and non-seizure EEG signals. These classifiers are applied to a public dataset, namely the University of Bonn, which consists of 2 classes –seizure and non-seizure. In addition, a fast Walsh-Hadamard Transform (FWHT) technique is implemented to analyze the EEG signals within the recurrence space of the brain. Thus, Hadamard coefficients of the EEG signals are obtained via the FWHT. Moreover, the FWHT is contributed to generate an efficient derivation of seizure EEG recordings from non-seizure EEG recordings. Also, a k-fold cross-validation technique is applied to validate the performance of the proposed classifiers. The LSTM classifier provides the best performance, with a testing accuracy of 99.00%. The training and testing loss rates for the LSTM are 0.0029 and 0.0602, respectively, while the weighted average precision, recall, and F1-score for the LSTM are 99.00%. The results of the SVM classifier in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity reached 91%, 93.52%, and 91.3%, respectively. The computational time consumed for the training of the LSTM and SVM is 2000 and 2500 s, respectively. The results show that the LSTM classifier provides better performance than SVM in the classification of EEG signals. Eventually, the proposed classifiers provide high classification accuracy compared to previously published classifiers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohsen et al. (2023) studied Epilepsy. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) classifier with Fast Walsh-Hadamard Transform (FWHT) vs. Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier with FWHT was evaluated on Classification accuracy. The proposed LSTM classifier with Fast Walsh-Hadamard Transform achieved an average classification accuracy of 99.32% for distinguishing seizure and non-seizure EEG signals, outperforming the SVM classifier.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: