Why the study?
The study sought to determine whether body mass index and demographic factors influence dipper/non-dipper status and pulse pressure parameters in patients with and without hypertension.
Do body mass index and demographic factors affect dipper/non-dipper status and pulse pressure parameters in patients with and without hypertension?
Observational (n=147)
No
Do body mass index and demographic factors affect dipper/non-dipper status and pulse pressure parameters in patients with and without hypertension?
Higher age and BMI are associated with a diastolic non-dipper blood pressure pattern in hypertensive patients, and age correlates with an increased pulse pressure index.
Objective: In patients with and without a diagnosis of hypertension, we sought to ascertain if body mass index (BMI) and other demographic information affected dipper/non dipper and pulse pressure/pulse pressure index. Method: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) analysis of 56 patients with hypertension and 91 patients without hypertension was evaluated. We defined dipper as a drop in mean nocturnal blood pressure (BP) of >10% as compared with mean daytime values (non-dipper percentage 0.05). Diastolic dipper was observed in 46.4% of male patients and 39.3% of female patients in the hypertension group, and there was no statistically significant difference between them (p>0.05). In examination cases (group 2), Although the incidence of systolic dipper and diastolic dipper in male subjects (46.5% and 60.5%, respectively) was higher than in female subjects (27.1% and 39.6%, respectively), this difference was close to significance, but not statistically significant (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean age and BMI of systolic dipper and non-dipper cases (p>0.05). Besides, the mean age of the diastolic non dipper cases was statistically significantly higher than the diastolic dipper cases (p:0.048), and the mean BMI of the diastolic non dipper cases was statistically significantly higher than the diastolic dipper cases (p:0.034). Conclusion: It may be beneficial to include the mean pulse pressure/pulse pressure index in the evaluation of general, awake, and asleep pulse pressure while evaluating the ABPM result.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orhanoğlu et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=147). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was evaluated on Mean BMI in diastolic non-dipper vs dipper hypertensive patients (p=0.034).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: