Key result
This review provides guidance on clarifying research issues relating to social support definition, measurement, and study design to achieve well-designed studies.
This paper provides methodological guidance on defining, measuring, and designing studies to evaluate social support in healthcare research.
Should not yet guide social support interventions in cardiovascular care; leaves open improved study designs for researchers.
Research into the area of social support has been associated with confusion and concern. Much of the previous work in this area has inherent and serious difficulties, especially with regard to measurement issues surrounding the concept and with study design. However, it is paramount that social support research is further developed to allow effective interventions by health care professionals to influence positive outcomes in patient care. It is only by adopting a rigorous approach to social support research that its full potential can be achieved, that it can result in the positive promotion of recovery from mental and physical illness and that it can then become an important tool for the health care professional. This paper aims to clarify research issues relating to social support definition, measurement and study design, including methodology, selection of instruments and analysis. Guidance will be provided concerning the important factors to consider to achieve a well-designed study to measure social support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
C. B. Hutchison (1999) conducted a review in Social support. This review provides guidance on clarifying research issues relating to social support definition, measurement, and study design to achieve well-designed studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: