Key result
Endomyocardial biopsy was a safe technique with 0 lethal complications among 1250 patients, though diagnostic utility is limited by sampling error in focal diseases.
Why the study?
Does endomyocardial biopsy safely aid in detecting the underlying immunopathogenesis of heart failure?
Observational (n=1,250)
Does endomyocardial biopsy safely aid in detecting the underlying immunopathogenesis of heart failure?
Endomyocardial biopsy is a safe procedure that, when aided by immunohistology, reveals immunological parameters suggesting a need for reclassifying heart muscle diseases.
Endomyocardial biopsy may be safely performed in heart failure; leaves open immunohistology-guided reclassification of focal diseases pending prospective trials.
Endomyocardial biopsy in this study of 1250 biopsied patients (mean of five samples/patient) proved to be a remarkably safe technique with no lethal complications. It may help to detect the underlying cause of heart failure but is handicapped by sampling error in focal disease processes (such as myocarditis and sarcoid heart disease) when conventional light and electron microscopy are used. In this biopsy series 123 patients (9.8%) suffered from severe heart failure; lymphocytic infiltrates were found in only 10 (8%). Immunohistological data suggested a secondary humoral immunopathogenesis in all patients with myocarditis and perimyocarditis, in 75% of patients with postmyocarditic heart muscle disease and in 48% of patients with primary dilated cardiomyopathy. There may thus be a need for a new classification of heart muscle diseases that includes immunological parameters of humoral and cellular autoreactivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maisch et al. (1988) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=1,250). Endomyocardial biopsy was evaluated on Lethal complications. Endomyocardial biopsy was a safe technique with 0 lethal complications among 1250 patients, though diagnostic utility is limited by sampling error in focal diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: