Randomized controlled trial reveals enhanced arm recovery in subacute ischemic stroke, indicating that cerebellar stimulation boosts motor cortex therapy.
Background/Objectives: Cerebellum might be one of the targets of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for motor recovery in stroke patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the enhancing effects of rTMS over the cerebellum on inhibitory rTMS for motor recovery in patients with subacute ischemic stroke. Methods: Twenty-three patients with subacute ischemic stroke were recruited into this single-blind randomized, controlled study with a blinded observer. The Cr-Cbll group received Cr-Cbll rTMS consisting of continuous theta burst stimulation over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1), a shoulder mobilization exercise, and high-frequency rTMS over the contralesional cerebellum. The Cr-sham group received sham rTMS over the cerebellum instead of high-frequency rTMS. All participants received ten daily sessions for 2 weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) was measured before, immediately after, and 2 months after the intervention. Results: A total of 20 participants (10 in the Cr-Cbll group and 10 in the Cr-sham group) who completed the two-week intervention were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. There was no significant difference in general and clinical characteristics between the two groups at baseline. Total and upper extremity scores of FMA showed a significant interaction between time and group (p < 0.05). Each improvement of upper extremity score of FMA immediately and 2 months after the intervention was significantly higher in the Cr-Cbll group than in the Cr-sham group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These results demonstrated that rTMS over the cerebellum could have additional effects on inhibitory rTMS over contralesional M1 for improving upper extremity motor function in patients with subacute ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Journal of Clinical Medicine