Key result
Starting inclisiran is linked to ~38% lower LDL-C, but switching from PCSK9 mAbs shows an increase.
Why the study?
Data on the efficacy and safety of inclisiran in real-world clinical practice are scarce despite proven efficacy in clinical trials.
Does inclisiran reduce LDL-C levels in a real-world clinical setting?
Observational (n=65)
No
Does inclisiran reduce LDL-C levels in a real-world clinical setting?
Absolute Event Rate: -38% vs 38%
Real-world experience with inclisiran shows a 38% LDL-C reduction in naive patients, which is less than in clinical trials, and an unexpected LDL-C increase in patients switching from PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Attenuated real-world LDL-C response to inclisiran warrants caution on switching from mAbs; hypothesis-generating for optimal use.
Mulder et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Hypercholesterolemia (n=65). Inclisiran vs. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (for switch group) was evaluated on Median change in LDL-C levels at 3 months. In a real-world registry, newly starting inclisiran reduced LDL-C by 38% at 3 months, whereas switching from PCSK9 mAbs to inclisiran resulted in a 38% increase in LDL-C.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: