In a real-world registry, newly starting inclisiran reduced LDL-C by 38% at 3 months, whereas switching from PCSK9 mAbs to inclisiran resulted in a 38% increase in LDL-C.
Observational (n=65)
No
Does inclisiran reduce LDL-C levels in a real-world clinical setting?
65 patients (36 women, median age 63 years) at a lipid clinic in the Netherlands who started inclisiran as first line (n=45) or switched from PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (n=20).
Inclisiran initiation (either as first-line or switching from PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies).
Median change of LDL-C levels at 3 and 9 months after initiation.surrogate
Real-world experience with inclisiran shows a 38% LDL-C reduction in naive patients, which is less than in clinical trials, and an unexpected LDL-C increase in patients switching from PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: -38% vs 38%
•Inclisiran lowers LDL-C by -38 % at 3 months in real-world setting.•Patients who use statin co-medication had a greater LDL-C reduction of -45 %.•Most patients switching from PCSK9 mAbs to inclisiran showed an increase in LDL-C.•Inclisiran has a favourable safety profile in real-world setting at 3 and 9 months follow-up. Background and objectiveInclisiran is the first-in-class small interfering RNA (siRNA) proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor. In clinical trials inclisiran showed effective and sustained low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction of ± 50 %. As data in clinical setting are scarce, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety in clinical practice.MethodsWe describe a registry of consecutive patients who started with inclisiran at a lipid clinic of a university hospital. Patients were eligible if they fulfilled the reimbursement criteria in the Netherlands. Patients were included if they started with inclisiran as first line (group 1) or switched from PCSK9 monoclonal antibody (mAbs) to inclisiran (group 2). LDL-C levels were measured at 3 and 9 months after initiation of inclisiran. Median change of LDL-C levels was calculated on an individual and group level.ResultsWe analysed 65 patients (36 women), median 25th percentile; 75th percentile age of 63 54; 68 years. Of these, 44 patients had both a 3 month and 9 month visit. At 3 months, patients who newly started inclisiran (group 1, n = 45) showed a LDL-C decrease of 38 -49;-33 %. Patients who used statins as co-medication (n = 15) had a higher median LDL-C decrease compared to those without statin use (n=30; 45 % vs 38 %). However, patients who switched from mAbs to inclisiran (group 2, n = 20) had an increase in LDL-C of 38 +4; +97 %. Adverse effects associated with inclisiran were mild and consisted of mild injection site reactions. Efficacy was slightly less whereas safety results were similar at 9 months.ConclusionOur initial experience of inclisiran in a clinical setting showed less reduction in LDL-C levels compared to clinical trials but a similar safety profile. Moreover, patients who switched from PCSK9 mAbs to inclisiran generally showed an increase in LDL-C levels implying that inclisiran is less potent in LDL-C reduction compared to PCSK9 mAbs. Inclisiran is the first-in-class small interfering RNA (siRNA) proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor. In clinical trials inclisiran showed effective and sustained low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction of ± 50 %. As data in clinical setting are scarce, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety in clinical practice. We describe a registry of consecutive patients who started with inclisiran at a lipid clinic of a university hospital. Patients were eligible if they fulfilled the reimbursement criteria in the Netherlands. Patients were included if they started with inclisiran as first line (group 1) or switched from PCSK9 monoclonal antibody (mAbs) to inclisiran (group 2). LDL-C levels were measured at 3 and 9 months after initiation of inclisiran. Median change of LDL-C levels was calculated on an individual and group level. We analysed 65 patients (36 women), median 25th percentile; 75th percentile age of 63 54; 68 years. Of these, 44 patients had both a 3 month and 9 month visit. At 3 months, patients who newly started inclisiran (group 1, n = 45) showed a LDL-C decrease of 38 -49;-33 %. Patients who used statins as co-medication (n = 15) had a higher median LDL-C decrease compared to those without statin use (n=30; 45 % vs 38 %). However, patients who switched from mAbs to inclisiran (group 2, n = 20) had an increase in LDL-C of 38 +4; +97 %. Adverse effects associated with inclisiran were mild and consisted of mild injection site reactions. Efficacy was slightly less whereas safety results were similar at 9 months. Our initial experience of inclisiran in a clinical setting showed less reduction in LDL-C levels compared to clinical trials but a similar safety profile. Moreover, patients who switched from PCSK9 mAbs to inclisiran generally showed an increase in LDL-C levels implying that inclisiran is less potent in LDL-C reduction compared to PCSK9 mAbs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Janneke W.C.M. Mulder
Erasmus MC
Annette M.H. Galema‐Boers
Erasmus MC
Jeanine E. Roeters van Lennep
Preventive Cardiology
Journal of clinical lipidology
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Erasmus MC
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mulder et al. (Mon,) realizaron un estudio observacional en Hipercolesterolemia (n=65). Se evaluó Inclisiran frente a anticuerpos monoclonales PCSK9 (para el grupo de cambio) en el cambio mediano en los niveles de LDL-C a los 3 meses. En un registro del mundo real, el inicio de inclisiran redujo LDL-C en un 38% a los 3 meses, mientras que cambiar de mAbs de PCSK9 a inclisiran resultó en un aumento del 38% en LDL-C.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a155ee15347fbb1739fac6c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2023.09.005
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: