Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let đ«n be the trivial principal bundle with structural group G and base space đ«nâ1, đ«1 being the usual fiber bundle of gauge theories. In order to give a geometrical interpretation to the FaddeevâPopov fields, as well as to the Becchi, Rouet, and Stora transformations, we need to use the fiber bundle đ«3. The gauge fields and the FaddeevâPopov ghost and antighost fields appear as part of certain 1-forms defined on the base space đ«2. The anticommuting character of the ghost and antighost fields is essentially due to their identification with 1-forms. The Becchi, Rouet, and Stora transformations are identified with generalized infinitesimal gauge transformations on đ«3 of parameters related to the ghost fields. We obtain a further invariance of the action given by a similar generalized infinitesimal gauge transformation on đ«3 related to the antighost fields.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
QuirĂłs et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: