Key result
Pulmonary vein isolation using a single high-density mesh ablator catheter achieved 100% acute isolation in most veins except the right inferior PV (47%), with 64% in sinus rhythm at 11 months.
Why the study?
Does pulmonary vein isolation using a single high-density mesh ablator catheter achieve acute isolation and prevent atrial fibrillation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF?
Observational (n=17)
No
Does pulmonary vein isolation using a single high-density mesh ablator catheter achieve acute isolation and prevent atrial fibrillation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF?
Pulmonary vein isolation using a single high-density mesh ablator catheter is feasible and safe, with higher midterm efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm for paroxysmal compared to persistent AF patients.
Initial case experience indicates safety and feasibility; leaves open the need for randomized trials before clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this single center study is to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a single high-density mesh ablator (HDMA) catheter. METHODS: A total of 17 consecutive patients with paroxysmal (10 patients) or persistent atrial fibrillation (7 patients) and no heart disease were enrolled. A single transseptal puncture was performed and the HDMA was placed at each PV ostium identified with anatomic and electrophysiological mapping. Pulsed radiofrequency (RF) energy was delivered at the targeted temperature of 58 degrees C with maximum power of 80 watts. No other ablation system was utilized. The primary objective of the study was acute isolation of the targeted PV, and the secondary objective was clinical efficacy and safety of PVI with HDMA for atrial fibrillation (AF) prevention. Patients were followed at intervals of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: PVI was attempted with HDMA in 67/67 PVs. [Correction made after online publication October 27, 2008: PVs changed from 6/67 to 67/67] Acute success rate were: 100% (16/16) for left superior PV, 100% (16/16) for left inferior PV, 100% (17/17) for right superior PV, 100% (1/1) for left common trunk and 47% (8/17) for right inferior PV. Total procedure time was 200 +/- 36 minutes (range 130-240 minutes) and total fluoroscopy time was 42 +/- 18 minutes (range 23-75 minutes). During a mean follow-up of 11 +/- 4 months, 64% of patients remained in sinus rhythm (8/10 paroxysmal AF and 3/7 for persistent AF). No complications occurred either acutely or at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: PV isolation with HDMA is feasible and safe. The midterm efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm is higher in paroxysmal than in persistent patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filippo et al. (2008) conducted an observational in paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (n=17). high-density mesh ablator (HDMA) catheter was evaluated on acute isolation of the targeted PV. Pulmonary vein isolation using a single high-density mesh ablator catheter achieved 100% acute isolation in most veins except the right inferior PV (47%), with 64% in sinus rhythm at 11 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: