Key result
Post-submaximal exercise heart rate recovery exhibited a bivariate response following a half-marathon, dropping to 14.9 bpm on the same day (p<0.001) and rebounding to 30.1 bpm one day later (p=0.006).
Why the study?
The study investigated the effect of prolonged exertion on cardiac parasympathetic reorganization and associated aerobic performance during repeated short-lasting submaximal exercise bouts performed for 7 days post-exertion.
Does repeated short-lasting submaximal exercise following a half-marathon affect cardiac parasympathetic recovery and aerobic performance in recreational runners?
Observational (n=19)
Does repeated short-lasting submaximal exercise following a half-marathon affect cardiac parasympathetic recovery and aerobic performance in recreational runners?
Repeated submaximal exercise bouts following prolonged exertion reveal a bivariate time response in cardiac parasympathetic recovery, offering a noninvasive tool to evaluate training history impact in recreational athletes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide noninvasive parasympathetic recovery monitoring in recreational runners; hypothesis-generating for repeated submaximal exercise effects, needing prospective confirmation.
This study investigated the effect of prolonged exertion on cardiac parasympathetic (cPS) reorganization and associated aerobic performance in response to repeated short-lasting submaximal exercise bouts (SSE) performed for 7 days following prolonged exertion. In 19 recreational runners, heart rate (HR) and HR variability (HRV) indices (lnRMSSD, lnHF, and lnLF/HF) were monitored pre- and post-submaximal graded cycling performed on consecutive days following a half-marathon (HM) and compared with the baseline, pre-HM values. Additionally, HR recovery (HRR), aerobic performance, and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were determined. HR, HRV indices, and HRR were tested for correlation with exercise performance. A significant time effect was found in HR, HRR, and HRV indices as well as in aerobic performance and RPE during the study period. Most of the measured parameters differed from their baseline values only on the same day following HM. However, HRR and HR measured in recovery after SSE were additionally affected one day following the half-marathon yet in opposite directions to those recorded on the same day as the HM. Thus, postSSE HR and HRR exhibited a bivariate time response (postSSE HR: 102 ± 14 bpm; p < 0.001; 82 ± 11 bpm; p = 0.007 vs. 88 ± 11 bpm; HRR in 30 s after SSE cessation: 14.9 ± 4.9 bpm; p < 0.001; 30.1 ± 13.3 bpm; p = 0.006 vs. 24.4 ± 10.8 bpm), potentially indicating a cPS dysfunction phase on the same day and cPS rebound phase one day following HM reflected also in consecutive changes in aerobic power. Correlations were found between the changes in measured cardiac indices with respect to baseline and the changes in aerobic performance indices throughout the study period. The effect of exercise history on cPS reorganization is more pronounced in response to SSE than at rest. Accordingly, we conclude that SSE performed repeatedly on a daily basis following prolonged exertion offers a noninvasive tool to evaluate the impact of training history on cPS recovery and associated aerobic power output in recreational athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Špenko et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Recreational runners (n=19). Prolonged exertion (half-marathon) vs. Baseline (pre-half-marathon) was evaluated on Cardiac parasympathetic reorganization (HR, HRV, HRR) and aerobic performance. Post-submaximal exercise heart rate recovery exhibited a bivariate response following a half-marathon, dropping to 14.9 bpm on the same day (p<0.001) and rebounding to 30.1 bpm one day later (p=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: