Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Knowledge graphs (KGs) such as DBpedia often contain systematic type errors caused not by missing facts but by lexical ambiguity: entities with proper names (e.g., musical bands, natural places, animals) are mis-typed as Person. We term this phenomenon Label-Induced Class Ambiguity (LICA). We propose DeLICA (Detecting Label-Induced Class Ambiguity), an interpretable, pattern-based method that detects such mis-typings by combining predicate with lightweight ontology cues. DELICA learns a compact bank of latent predicate patterns, composes entity representations from predicates and ontology-derived features, and refines labels through a conservative Expectation-Maximization (EM)-style loop with instance-weighting and ranking regularization. It outputs concise pattern-level explanations to support human curation. We formalize the detection problem, connect pattern purity to recoverability under mild assumptions, and introduce practical diagnostics. On DBpedia-style benchmarks, DELICA improves detection quality over lexical heuristics, and unsupervised baselines, while remaining interpretable and practical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diop et al. (2025) studied this question.