Key result
Nurse-led primary care clinics with computerized decision support and near-patient testing improved the proportion of time spent in the therapeutic INR range compared to hospital care (P=0.008).
Why the study?
Does a nurse-led primary care clinic with computerized decision support and near-patient testing improve therapeutic control of INR in patients on oral anticoagulation compared to routine hospital management?
Population
367 patients requiring oral anticoagulation monitoring across 12 primary care practices
Comparison
Nurse-led primary care anticoagulation clinic… vs Routine hospital management (hospital clinic)
Design
RCT, Randomized at both practice level and patient level within intervention…
Authors
Loading...
Supports shifting anticoagulation monitoring to nurse-led primary care; extends RCT evidence for computerized decision support.
RCT (n=367)
Randomized
Yes
Does a nurse-led primary care clinic with computerized decision support and near-patient testing improve therapeutic control of INR in patients on oral anticoagulation compared to routine hospital management?
p-value: p=0.008
A nurse-led primary care anticoagulation clinic using computerized decision support and near-patient testing provides INR control at least as good as routine hospital follow-up, with significantly improved time in therapeutic range.
Fitzmaurice et al. (2000) conducted an RCT in Patients requiring oral anticoagulation (n=367). Nurse-led primary care clinic with near-patient testing and computerized decision support vs. Routine hospital management was evaluated on Therapeutic control of the international normalized ratio (p=0.008). Nurse-led primary care clinics with computerized decision support and near-patient testing improved the proportion of time spent in the therapeutic INR range compared to hospital care (P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: