Key result
Post-pacing interval variability assessment distinguished circuitous from centrifugal atrial activation patterns with high sensitivity (94% and 92.8%) and 100% specificity (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the variability in post-pacing intervals predict the global atrial activation pattern during tachycardia in patients undergoing ablation for organized atrial arrhythmias?
Observational (n=28)
Does the variability in post-pacing intervals predict the global atrial activation pattern during tachycardia in patients undergoing ablation for organized atrial arrhythmias?
Variability in post-pacing intervals can rapidly and accurately distinguish between circuitous and centrifugal atrial activation patterns during tachycardia.
INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of the global atrial activation pattern is critical to ablation of an atrial arrhythmia. We hypothesized that the variability in post-pacing intervals (PPIs) with pacing at different cycle lengths (CLs) from the same pacing site, regardless of distance to the circuit, can be used to identify atrial activation patterns during tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients referred for ablation of organized atrial arrhythmias were included (n = 28, 31 total tachycardias). The variability in PPIs (PPIV) was calculated by comparing the difference in PPIs after overdrive pacing with 5-second trains 10, 20, and 30 ms shorter than the tachycardia cycle length (TCL). The global activation pattern was defined as circuitous (macroreentrant atrial circuit) or centrifugal (focal origin with centrifugal radiation) by electroanatomic mapping. Except for one case, all pacing was performed from the proximal coronary sinus bipole. Circuitous tachycardias (n = 17, all macro-reentrant) exhibited minimal variability with pacing at 10 ms and 30 ms shorter than TCL (6.0 +/- 2.5 ms), whereas centrifugal tachycardias (n = 14, 8 microreentrant) displayed a high degree of variability (56.5 +/- 20.6 ms). Rank sum analysis of PPIV suggests that the two groups are indeed distinct (P < 0.001). Using PPIV cutoffs of <or=10 ms and >or=30 ms, circuitous and centrifugal activation patterns could be distinguished with a high degree of sensitivity (94% circuitous, 92.8% centrifugal) and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the use of PPIV to rapidly and accurately predict the global activation pattern during atrial arrhythmia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colombowala et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Organized atrial arrhythmias (n=28). Post-pacing interval variability (PPIV) assessment vs. Electroanatomic mapping was evaluated on Global atrial activation pattern (circuitous vs centrifugal) (p=<0.001). Post-pacing interval variability assessment distinguished circuitous from centrifugal atrial activation patterns with high sensitivity (94% and 92.8%) and 100% specificity (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: